Who took the picture?

[Skeptical]

Here is where I was looking, Carol:

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingt...cedsearch.html

If you go so far as to track down an article from 1952, they will allow you to preview the first sentence or two of the story. Anything beyond that will cost you money. They were nice enough to offer you a framed copy for a cool $124.95. Not exactly conducive to doing much research.

I'm betting there's a university or public library somewhere that has the Post on microfilm (or whatever the 21st century equivalent might be). You could browse till your heart's content and it wouldn't cost you anything. I remember some rather creepy nights in the basement of my University library looking through the microfilm of the London Times from 1888. Nothing like reading Jack the Ripper stories all by yourself in a dusty, dimly-lit library.

S

[Carol Nistri]

Oh now that sounds like a real good time Skep,order in some chinese and thats a night.Ill call my library this week and ask them,seems to me Ive seen college kids looking at microfilm at Mary Cheney library.Ill jot down the name of the paper and the date Im interested in right?

( Btw,that reminds me I got a kitten from Protectors of Animals,they said he needed a bolster shot for distemper,I took him to our vet and it ended up costing me well over two hundred bucks.Then I saw a little sign while I was holding the door open for someone trying to exit the store with a full basket,it said all kinds of shots $15.00. I brought my second kitty Pumpkin to the store and for fifteen bucks got her her rabies shot.Might do well for everyone during these lean times to take heed.Skepticals idea of viewing those microfilms at the library for free is an excellent idea,for all of you that have been putting off bringing your dog or kitty to the vet check out your local pet store,there all doing it now.Ok,now back to our regularly scheduled programming.)