Originally Posted by starman2003
They were retired hence theoretically speaking just for themselves--although IMO they were still secretly doing the government's bidding.
Maybe I don't make myself clear. LIES which "support" the ETH in fact diminish it.
It is precisely because there IS truth to it that it has to be kept under wraps, as best they can. Tarnishing the reputation of the whole field is a pretty good way to do it. They could just rely on denial, but inevitably there will be believers, trying to spread belief, so they have to make them look bad.
Inasmuch as the government evidently believes maintanance of the coverup is vital, and may impart this belief to its own, it would be a good mission.
But Corso didn't make a "deathbed"confession, nor others.
Well, I suppose it's fine after all if you, darrell & orange believe Corso. Assuming he acted on the basis of a government plan, based on info we're not privy to....maybe it's for the best after all.
perhaps you should work on your reading abilities. I never said that I believe Corso's claims to be true. I said that I thought him to seem credible during his tv interview. In this thread I have postulated scenarios both pro and con concerning him. I actually consider the evidence too sparse to come to any conclusion about the truth in his story. We will always speculate about what he actually knew versus what he thought he knew.
I would like to find that his story is true, because that then would lend credibility to the Roswell crash as being of a vehicle of unknown origin. As I have stated repeatedly, I find his claim to technological advances trivial compared with his claims of actually handling alien technology and having witnessed dead alien bodies. It is the man's relationship with Roswell that would prove important -- technology be damned. We can do our own technology without any help from aliens.