Phil Corso

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by Carol Nistri

Dr.Wu the reason I brought up Alexander was because he shouldnt have had to go anywhere near Corso,of course Corso was going to say the book was true,of course he was.IF Alexander was going to get to the bottom of it all as an "Insider" he should have been able to prove or disprove what Corso said without going anywhere near the guy,in other words as an "Insider" he should have had other sources available to him other than Corso himself.

Carol.....I have exlplained this several times to you already...do you even read the posts I make to you..?
I'm sure he had plenty of other sources but as he clearly explained in his book-...you did read it right..?....-he never found any secret group while on the inside. Is that clear enough...? Before he wrote his point of view on all of this, he probably wanted to see if Corso did really know anything by talking to him personally before he set pen to paper. I would have done the same thing and imo any other researcher who had the opportunity in his situation would have probably done the same thing.
There is no mystery here...it's simple research and an opportunity to hear Corso's personal side of the story-face to face -which again if you read Alexander's book you will know why he wanted to talk to him in the flesh. Can you tell me why?
At any rate it's just Alexander's point of view in his own book and he wanted to interview the man in person. Why this is such a stumbling block or mystery for some people is beyond me.

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by starman2003

I'm not saying Alexander stated explicitly he opposed the idea of crashed saucers or a secret government UFO group, and his purpose was to debunk it. No way. Of course he claims an objective search for the truth, but I don't think he was being ingenuous, not any more than a bunch of others. In this field you should take little if anything at face value.

We finally agree on something.....


btw..did you mean to say disingenuous..?

[starman2003]

Originally Posted by Carol Nistri

I dont have that book in front of me but I was smitten with Alexander trying to convince the reader that if anyone in the world would have an inside track to secret ufo groups it would be him.

In theory, perhaps, given his connections. But I don't see how any serious researcher, writing in just the past few years i.e. well after The Day After Roswell fell out of favor, would bother with corso.

When John Alexander was on Coast I think the listners tore him a new one.All he had to say was there was no cover up and no group assigned to ufo investigation,um the public doesnt believe that.I dont either.

Nor I.

[Carol Nistri]

Dr.Wu there you go again,the way I interpert Alexanders writing just happens to be my interpretation I just dont believe that this government doesnt have a secret body of people that are bent on capturing a ufo and or to satisfy a mystery that must plague this government much much more than we sitting here in the comfort of our homes reading a select few cases that show up as news.What about those ufos flying with impunity over government installations? If they can do that and reports have come to us over the years that they can and will do exactly that.If they can fly over Nuclear plants and launch sites restricted areas etc.It would seem to me that it goes without saying that someone would want to know exactly what were dealing with.I dont have that book in front of me at the moment but I soon will,then you will see how the two of us can read the same book and come away with two different viewpoints,that doesnt make you right btw.Btw,and before I forget doesnt Alexander say that disclosure has already happend,that he admits there are strange things flying around in the night sky? Ill tell you what,as soon as I have possession of that book Ill challenge you to a duel,your take and my take on Alexanders book,now that should be interesting.

[starman2003]

Originally Posted by Carol Nistri

I just dont believe that this government doesnt have a secret body of people that are bent on capturing a ufo

The issue is whether they already have.

Btw,and before I forget doesnt Alexander say that disclosure has already happend,that he admits there are strange things flying around in the night sky?

From what I've heard, he favors the reality of UFOs and the ETH but just doesn't think the government has any physical proof nor any secret group devoted to the phenomenon.

[Carol Nistri]

You know what Starman,because this guy seemed to be a tad chatty it could be that this is being kept secret from him,I believe with all my heart that theres a secret side of government that is intently interested in this phenomenon. Ronald Reagan made no secret of the fact that he was intensly interested in ufos,can you imagine him being briefed on a fighter jet being teased by a ufo,as Commander and Chief I should think that this was one of the things the President would be made aware of.

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by Carol Nistri

Dr.Wu there you go again,the way I interpert Alexanders writing just happens to be my interpretation I just dont believe that this government doesnt have a secret body of people that are bent on capturing a ufo and or to satisfy a mystery that must plague this government much much more than we sitting here in the comfort of our homes reading a select few cases that show up as news.What about those ufos flying with impunity over government installations? If they can do that and reports have come to us over the years that they can and will do exactly that.If they can fly over Nuclear plants and launch sites restricted areas etc.It would seem to me that it goes without saying that someone would want to know exactly what were dealing with.I dont have that book in front of me at the moment but I soon will,then you will see how the two of us can read the same book and come away with two different viewpoints,that doesnt make you right btw.Btw,and before I forget doesnt Alexander say that disclosure has already happend,that he admits there are strange things flying around in the night sky? Ill tell you what,as soon as I have possession of that book Ill challenge you to a duel,your take and my take on Alexanders book,now that should be interesting.

There is no 'take on the book'. One either believes what he says or one doesn't period. You don't because imo you want to believe the ETH and some secret group..that's your bias.
I have no bias about the ETH itself (i do think some cases support the edh more but that has nothing to do with Alexander's book..)...I simply want to known the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth, whatever it might be, while you have already made up your mind that anyone who doesn't support your idea of aliens is lying.

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by starman2003

From what I've heard, he favors the reality of UFOs and the ETH but just doesn't think the government has any physical proof nor any secret group devoted to the phenomenon.

That's basically what he says in the book but you might want to read it yourself since you are obviously deeply into the ufo phenom .
He also supports the idea that some cases might be EDH.

[Carol Nistri]

Then the EDH can mimic ET? They might be working together,think about it.ET needs a cover,theve studied Earth and know that there are things that simply cant be explained,they wait until were all paranoid then come here by the thousands,using our oceans as a landing zone.They tuck themselves into the EDH and americans in particular go about their daily lives with a ho hum to ufos.Now why does that seem comfortable to me? We all know not just believe that flying saucers do haunt the skies of our world.Even the skeptics let slip now and then that this part has become a sort of gimmie.

[starman2003]

Originally Posted by Carol Nistri

Then the EDH can mimic ET?

Or the other way around at times. The phenomenon often seems so deceptive, with entities spouting nonsense or obvious lies.