Contactee Blood Groups

[Mac 5]

Here are the findings of the blood type study done by the International Community for Alien Research (I.C.A.R) This is by far the largest and most in depth study of this kind done, to date, by any organization. Conclusions come from a total of 20 different sources and more then 1400 contactees who took part in this study…

Here are the number of contactees per each blood type.

Contactees:

O Neg 470 36%
O Pos 383 27%
A Neg 64 4.5%
A Pos 176 12.5%
B Neg 43 3%
B Pos 43 3%
AB Neg 142 10%
AB Pos 44 3%

Distribution of Blood Types World Wide:

O Rh positive: 37 percent
A Rh positive: 36 percent
B Rh positive: 9 percent
AB Rh positive: 3 percent
O Rh negative: 7 percent
A Rh negative: 6 percent
B Rh negative: 1 percent
AB Rh negative: 1 percent

Part 2: Eye Colors in Contactees. Green / Hazel eyes make up 48 % of the 1400 Contactees that took part in this study and make up 70 % of the O Neg group. Blue eyes making up 36% of the blood types and 23 % of The O Neg group Brown eyes make up 16 % of the study group and 7 % Of the O Neg Group. I find it most interesting that the blood type et picks up the most is O Negative and it's a new mutation of the blood types. Rh neg only showed up between 25 and 40 000 years ago and O Neg is the universal donor type very strange that it just appeared out of nowhere and it saves 1000s of live every year and yet the only Blood that a O neg person can take is O neg and half of all contactees have a Rh neg blood type very interesting .

Strange Facts Concerning Rh-Negatives

February 28Craig Hudson
* Rh-negative women and men display Reptilian Traits:
* An EXTRA-Vertebra (a "Tail Bone"). Some are born with an actual tail (called a "Cauda"). In Sanskrit, Ketuu = The south Lunar Node, also known as Cauda/Draconis, in latin, "dragon's tail" in English.
* Lower than normal Body Temperature
* Lower than normal Blood Pressure
* Higher mental analytical abilities
* Higher Negative-ion shielding (from positive "charged" virus/bacteria) around the body
* High Sensitivity to EM and ELF Fields
* Hyper Vision and other senses
* Have a strong sense of mission or purpose

More TRAITS found in RH negatives:

There are certain similarities that occur to those having RH negative blood - according to some who have it there are common patterns found, which include the following:

1. predominance of green or hazel eyes that change color, also blue eyes
2. reddish hair , brown
3. low pulse rate
4. low blood pressure
5. keen sight or hearing
6. ESP
7. extra rib or vertabrae
8. UFO connections
9. love of space and science
10. a sense of not belonging to the human race
11. piercing eyes
12. para-normal occurrences
13. physic dreams
14. truth seekers
15. desire for higher wisdom
16. empathetic illnesses
17. deep compassion for fate of mankind
18. a sense of a 'mission' in life
19. physic abilities
20. unexplained scars on body
21. capability to disrupt electrical appliances
22. alien contacts

Blood provides an ideal opportunity for the study of human variation without cultural prejudice. It can be easily classified for many different genetically inherited blood typing systems. Also significant is the fact that we rarely take blood types into consideration in selecting mates. In addition, few people know their own type today and no one did a century ago. As a result, differences in blood type frequencies around the world are most likely due to other factors than social discrimination. Contemporary Japan is somewhat of an exception since there are popular Japanese stereotypes about people with different blood types. This could affect choice in marriage partners for some Japanese.

[dr wu23]

Interesting ...but some questions need answered:

How was it determined one was a 'contactee'? By their word? Does that mean abductees and contactees both?
Was the testing done accurately and with no mistakes ?
And will it be repeated to make certain there is consistency?
And scientifically does it really tell us anything?


btw..there are 2 ICAR's

http://www.icar1.com/ this is the 'blood study' group
http://www.icar1.com/Contactee_Blood_Types.html

the other ICAR
http://www.ufoabduction.com/

[Mac 5]

Originally Posted by dr wu23

Interesting ...but some questions need answered:

How was it determined one was a 'contactee'? By their word? Does that mean abductees and contactees both?
Was the testing done accurately and with no mistakes ?
And will it be repeated to make certain there is consistency?
And scientifically does it really tell us anything?


btw..there are 2 ICAR's

http://www.icar1.com/ this is the 'blood study' group
http://www.icar1.com/Contactee_Blood_Types.html

the other ICAR
http://www.ufoabduction.com/

Hi Dr Wu, i obtained this through the UFO & Paranormal Research Society of Australia. I've sent a request for a source link to the original data....

[Mac 5]

Here's the original source link for anyone who wishes to investigate further:

Just press continue:

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...ml&h=hAQG6CMHB

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...2F&h=XAQFAVEv3

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by Mac 5

Hi Dr Wu, i obtained this through the UFO & Paranormal Research Society of Australia. I've sent a request for a source link to the original data....

As far as I can tell this is who did the study...your facebook link goes here.

http://www.icar1.com/Contactee_Blood_Types.html

[Mac 5]

Originally Posted by dr wu23

As far as I can tell this is who did the study...your facebook link goes here.

http://www.icar1.com/Contactee_Blood_Types.html

That's correct.. This was e-mailed to a member of the UFO & Paranormal Research Society of Australia about a year ago. He has no further information beyond the link.

At least it's a starting point of investigation for those interested....

What struck me (if the findings are accurate) was the 'O' +/- groups. They total 63%, is there something special about the 'O' group?

[Martin]

Thanks Mac, interesting findings. I'd never thought of breaking them down this way before.

[Mac 5]

Originally Posted by Martin

Thanks Mac, interesting findings. I'd never thought of breaking them down this way before.

You're welcome!

[dr wu23]

Originally Posted by Mac 5

What struck me (if the findings are accurate) was the 'O' +/- groups. They total 63%, is there something special about the 'O' group?

Not that I know of but I think one of the O groups is a universal donor group. I don't even know what my own blood type is.
Something like this needs to be done again perhaps with a different set of 'contactees' and then with a different control group from past studies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type a summary of this area

-most humans are either O+, A+ , or B+

[Mac 5]

Originally Posted by dr wu23

Not that I know of but I think one of the O groups is a universal donor group. I don't even know what my own blood type is.
Something like this needs to be done again perhaps with a different set of 'contactees' and then with a different control group from past studies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type a summary of this area

-most humans are either O+, A+ , or B+

I agree!